Tuesday, July 31, 2018

A Capital Idea


Trump wants to unilaterally lower the capital gains tax.  A capital idea!  You rich people need a break. Your third vacation home probably needs some repairs and you've got to fund your great grandkid's college. God bless you.

Monday, July 30, 2018

Middlebrow


Does the term "middlebrow" still have resonance? Does anybody still read James Michener? Readers Digest condensed books? "Gone With the Wind" a right of passage? Shop at Old Navy? A big night out at Cracker Barrel? Excited about going to Panama City? Nobody I know I hope. Otherwise I'll try to look away while I snicker.

A Corrupt Political PARTY

Repent, Republicans, the end is nigh: But turning on Donald Trump isn’t enough

Some #NeverTrumpers and Republican dissidents now seek redemption. OK — but they’ve got a lot of work to do


184116
CHAUNCEY DEVEGA
JULY 30, 2018 10:00AM (UTC)
Likely because of his authoritarian behavior and policies, rather than despite them, Donald Trump is one of the most popular presidents within his own party in the era of modern public opinion polling. Republicans and right-leaning independents support him enthusiastically.
Republican and "conservative" elected officials, media personalities, interest groups and financial backers -- including the Koch brothers, who originally opposed him in 2016 -- overwhelmingly continue to support Trump's presidency, whatever private distaste they may feel. 
There do exist Republicans and other conservatives who have stood up to oppose Trump, his movement and the anti-democratic values and goals they represent. 
The #NeverTrumpers, for a variety of reasons, believe that Donald Trump is too disruptive and destructive to America’s longstanding norms and traditions. Conservative pundits and commentators such as George Will argue that Trump and his control over the Republican Party represent a fundamental threat to the country and its future.
They are joined by a modest number of former Republicans, including Steve Schmidt, Richard Painter and James Comey, who have left the Republican Party because it has morphed into an abomination wholly controlled by the demagogue Donald Trump.
This last group stands almost alone in their bold and principled decision: Most Republicans and conservatives still find ways to rationalize their support for many of the president's policies, even if they find him detestable.
Writing at the Weekly Standard, Andy Smarick works through this logic and its deeply problematic assumptions and implications. He finds a "consensus ... among conservative dissidents":
We’ll continue to oppose the president when his policies and practices are counter to our principles, they say, but also be sure to publicly give credit whenever he stakes out an agreeable position on any issue that matters. During the campaign, obdurate opposition served the purpose of challenging his candidacy and elevating his competitors, but now, with Trump sitting in the Oval Office, the thinking goes, it smacks of sour grapes — and, given that he does do things with which we agree, it amounts to cutting off our noses to spite our faces. So, serve as the loyal opposition as necessary but join the cause when possible.
It is a coherent approach. It is the pragmatic one. But it is unsatisfying and unsettling. And with each casual lie, crude insult, attack on the media, slight of the intelligence community, and example of grotesque servility to Russia’s dictator, it increasingly appears morally misguided.
Smarick continues that this conservative "need to cordon off specific Trump actions from others is a red flag waving in the wind." Even the most objectionable political leaders provide "some good to some number of people," after all, which Smarick calls "the making-the-trains-run-on-time argument." He reminds us that "time judges unkindly those who cheered the timely trains" and concludes that "given the enormity of the stakes, placing a gold star on the president’s occasional successful assignment is unwarranted and unwise. The road to Hell is paved with a piecemeal, situational approach to morality."
Smarick’s conclusion signals at a much deeper problem. Trump and the American proto-fascist movement he leads did not appear out of the ether as a total surprise. Trumpism was perhaps the inevitable result of an extreme rightward shift in the Republican Party and movement conservatism that began in the 1950s with an embrace of anti-intellectualism, paranoia and conspiracy theories. Republicans continued down that path by embracing the overtly racist “Southern Strategy” in response to the gains of black Americans during the civil rights movement. 
Richard Nixon passed that baton to Ronald Reagan, who advanced the right-wing agenda with racist stereotypes about lazy, criminal and parasitic black “welfare queens” and “strapping young bucks” who leeched off “hard-working” Americans (almost universally understood to be white). 
John McCain's principal sin was selecting Sarah Palin as his running mate, an obvious Trump predecessor who embraced racist conspiracy theories -- years before Trump himself took "birtherism" mainstream -- and valorized ignorance as a “noble” character trait of “real” Americans. 
One consistent and not coincidental theme across these decades was an effort by Republicans and other conservatives to destroy the social safety net, reorient tax fiscal policies to siphon ever more money upward to the richest Americans, and restrict the civil rights and human rights of nonwhites, women, LGBT people, those with disabilities, Muslims, immigrants and so on. 
In essence, the #NeverTrump Republicans who now stand against Trump and his movement watered the roots of the tree for years, and are now aghast at how it gobbles up innocent passers-by like a monster in a children’s fairytale.
The Nation’s David Klion summarizes this state of affairs:
Russiagate isn’t just the narrow story of a few corrupt officials. It isn’t even the story of a corrupt president. It’s the story of a corrupt political party, the one currently holding all the levers of power in Washington. After Trump groveled before Putin in Helsinki, many Republicans in Washington proclaimed their solemn concern, just as they did when the president expressed his sympathy for the white supremacists in Charlottesville last year. But all of them are fully aware that they are abetting a criminal conspiracy, and probably more than one ….
Instead, we are being told something much more frightening: that Russiagate doesn’t end with Trump and his inner circle, that some members of Congress may be implicated, and that the Republican leadership therefore has a personal stake in preventing anyone beyond [Paul] Manafort and a few other flunkies from being held accountable. [Robert] Mueller and the FBI are giving everyone a glimpse at the scale of official corruption in Washington, and they’re warning us that they aren’t going to be able to rein it in all by themselves.
Ultimately, the pitifully small amount opposition to Donald Trump among current or former Republicans is driven by fear: Fear of how history will remember them when the final ledger of this dire crisis is tallied. Unfortunately for them, history does not grant absolution or forgiveness in piecemeal fashion.  
Republicans and other conservatives who have now decided to stand against Donald Trump still have dirty hands. For too long they have remained loyal to a political party that birthed a hybridized American fascism, and continues to protect a president who, to all appearances, colluded with a foreign power to steal the 2016 election from the American people.
To find some modest amount of salvation, Republicans who truly want to do the right thing for a country they claim to love must renounce their party and leave it behind, while working to repair the damage that Donald Trump and his supporters have done. Remaining a Republican and being a patriotic American are now mutually exclusive.

HOW REPUBLICANS CONQUERED THE BADGER STATE

Author Dan Kaufman on the GOP's engineered strategy that led to "The Fall of Wisconsin."

"The Fall of Wisconsin": How Scott Walker and the GOP crushed the Badger state's progressive dreams
Wisconsin: it’s a state where everyone was sure Clinton would win (and didn’t) in 2016. It used to be known as the bastion for progressive politics, until conservatives, Tea Partiers and Scott Walker took over and turned it into a laboratory for the GOP. On “Salon Talks,” author Dan Kaufman presents his new book, [“The Fall of Wisconsin: The Conservative Conquest of a Progressive Bastion and the Future of American Politics,”]( http://www.amazon.com/dp/0393635201/?tag=saloncom08-20) which details one of the most shocking upheavals in recent political history and how Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has completely inverted the state. “One thing that was hugely significant was how Governor Scott Walker had de-unionized the state aggressively,” Kaufman told Salon’s Amanda Marcotte. “That was then copied by other states, and it began a nationwide demonization of public workers.” Watch the interview above to learn more about how Republicans toppled Wisconsin progressivism and what climate led to the downfall of Paul Ryan’s political career. Can a Democrat like union leader [Randy Bryce]( https://www.salon.com/2018/04/11/with-paul-ryan-leaving-will-it-be-randy-bryce-or-paul-nehlen/) rebuild Wisconsin’s legacy in 2018? Tune in for SalonTV's live shows, ["Salon Talks"]( https://video.salon.com/p/lzcPCDNc) and ["Salon Stage"]( https://video.salon.com/p/5n0BV6Ub), daily at noon ET / 9 a.m. PT and 4 p.m. ET / 1 p.m. PT, streaming live on [YouTube]( http://www.youtube.com/salontv), [Facebook]( https://www.facebook.com/pg/salon/videos/) and [Periscope]( https://www.pscp.tv/Salon).
 

CHAUNCEY DEVEGA

Chauncey DeVega is a politics staff writer for Salon. His essays can also be found at Chaunceydevega.com. He also hosts a weekly podcast, The Chauncey DeVega Show. Chauncey can be followed on Twitter and Facebook.
MORE FROM CHAUNCEY DEVEGA • FOLLOW CHAUNCEYDEVEGA • LIKE CHAUNCEY DEVEGA

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Time Passes


Time passes so quickly as we age. Time is like back aches and regrets. It can't be stopped. How do you age gracefully when it seems like only yesterday that I was 16, trying to figure out what I was going to do with my life. Actually I was thinking about this very thing again yesterday. What goes around comes around.

Friday, July 27, 2018

Pounding the Table

Trump proves the adage that if you don't have the facts on your side, pound the table. The POTUS is sure doing a lot of table pounding.

Just the Facts


"Just the facts ma'am"
-Sgt. Joe Friday
The dragnet moves forward day by day. Sgt. Friday and Officer Gannon keep exchanging meaningful glances.

Thursday, July 26, 2018

Woke Up


I woke up this morning. As Gomer Pyle would say, surprise! surprise! surprise! Calisthenics for seniors: I got outta bed and it only took 8 minutes. What more do you want? Checking Facebook: I'm now connected. What now? If only I had cakes on the griddle (life ain't nothing but a funny, funny riddle says John Denver) I'd have it made.

Sunday, July 22, 2018

The Equalizer 2 - (Movie Review)


Denzel Washington's character in "Equalizer 2" is reading Proust and and asks a young man he is tutoring to read Coates. It's worth seeing just for this. Entertaining movie anyway.

Friday, July 20, 2018

Review of Kakutani

REVIEW

BOOK REVIEWS

Without Breaking New Ground, 'The Death Of Truth' Is Convincing

The Death of Truth by Michko Kakutani
Ever since the election of Donald Trump as president, pundits have written obituaries for just about every virtue there is. The president's victory and the policies he's enacted, some commentators have argued, has marked the death of civility, tolerance, dignity, freedom and the American dream itself.
In her new book, former New York Times book critic Michiko Kakutani suggests that truth should be added to the list of casualties of the Trump administration, asking, "How did truth and reason become such endangered species, and what does their impending demise portend for our public discourse and the future of our politics and governance?"
The Death of Truth is a slim volume that's equally intriguing and frustrating, an uneven effort from a writer who is, nonetheless, always interesting to read.
Kakutani's book is as much a work of cultural criticism as it is a denunciation of the 45th president, whom she calls "a larger-than-life, over-the-top avatar of narcissism, mendacity, ignorance, prejudice, boorishness, demagoguery, and tyrannical impulses." Unsurprisingly, Kakutani turns to literature in her attempt to make sense of the post-truth Trump era. She contends that America is in the midst of a period marked by what author and historian Richard Hofstadter called "the paranoid style" of politics — that is, an obsession with conspiracy theories and a pervasive-but-baseless sense of values under attack.
So far, so good, but then Kakutani pivots to postmodernism to explain the rhetoric of Trump and his supporters. Quoting from a 2005 David Foster Wallace article about the increase of news outlets, Kakutani writes that the late novelist's words "uncannily predict the post-Trump cultural landscape, where truth increasingly seems to be in the eye of the beholder, facts are fungible and socially constructed, and we often feel as if we've been transported to an upside-down place where assumptions and alignments in place for decades have suddenly been turned inside out."
Postmodernism and its cousin, deconstruction, have ushered in an era of nihilism and relativism, Kakutani contends, though she stops short of blaming the movement for the rise of Trump. "[S]ome dumbed-down corollaries of their thinking have seeped into popular culture and been hijacked by the president's defenders, who want to use its relativistic arguments to excuse his lies, and by right-wingers who want to question evolution or deny the reality of climate change or promote alternative facts."
It's intriguing, if not entirely convincing. Deceit in politics and fiery reactionary rhetoric predate postmodernism, and it's fair to say that the majority of those showing up at Trump's rallies (or the majority of people in general) don't make it a habit to read the works of philosopher Jacques Derrida. To be fair, Kakutani acknowledges this, but the connection she draws between postmodernism and Trumpism still seems too tenuous to be of much use.
Kakutani finds herself on stronger footing when she discusses the linguistics behind Trump's speeches and tweets. The president is often criticized for rambling and using vague language; Kakutani notes that "[p]recise words ... mean little to Trump." And she addresses Trump's frequent misspellings on Twitter, arguing that his typos "are indicative of his impulsive, live-in-the-moment, can't-think-about-the-fallout posture." ("Covfefe," of course, makes an always-entertaining appearance in this chapter.) And she makes the case that Trump is essentially an Internet troll — but it's an observation that is hardly original.
Unfortunately, that's the case with so much of The Death of Truth. Kakutani is clearly sharp, and her arguments can be convincing. But nothing in the book breaks new ground. That's one consequence of having a president who is strongly criticized by many: There are only so many ways to call Trump a liar — and that particular well has been dry for a while now. That's not to say it's pointless to point out the president's dishonesty, but journalists have been doing that in real time since the beginning of Trump's campaign.
The Death of Truth isn't a bad book by any means. Kakutani is a remarkable writer, one of the best living American literary critics, and she has a gift for memorable turns of phrases — at one point, she compares Trump to a "manic cartoon artist's mashup of Ubu Roi, Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, and a character discarded by Molière."
As an overview of Trump's famously tenuous relationship with the truth, it's perfectly serviceable, but as a cultural criticism of Trumpism and the state of veracity in America today, it never really gets off the ground.