Friday, July 31, 2015

From Joan Walsh on Trump

There’s a childlike wishful thinking in these voters’ belief that Trump can solve all the country’s problems by being “tough.” And that’s what I meant with my reference to the “lowest common denominator” – I actually wasn’t referring to the voters themselves (in fact, that makes no sense); I was talking about the solutions they seem to embrace for the country’s woes. Pining for a “tough” guy who’s done well in “business” but is “one of us” is simplistic and a little scary. Most of that New Hampshire focus group seemed to want a daddy, not a president.

Matthew Algeo - Harry Truman's Excellent Adventure

The main thing I can say about this book is that it is lots of fun.  First of all, I like President Truman.  He is one of my 3 or 4 favorite Presidents.  Secondly, the story in this tale is quite remarkable---a capsule in time from 1953.

After relinquishing the Presidency to Eisenhower in January of 1953, Harry and his bride Bess returned to their home in Independence.  Truman was the last President to leave office without the benefit of Secret Service protection and the last chief executive to return to private life without a government pension.  In June of 1953 the Trumans took a personal automobile trip from Missouri to Washington D.C., to NYC, and then back to Independence by CAR driving on their own.  This is the amazing story told in this book.

All of his life Harry Truman loved automobiles.  For this trip he picked a new Chrysler New Yorker.  It was quite a luxury car for its time.  In writing this book, the author tracked down the car.  It is today in private hands.  Bess was supposed to keep at 55 MPH.  Of course, this was long before interstates.  We are so used to interstate we cannot imagine anymore traveling long distances without them.

Back and forth across the country the Trumans stayed in motels before there were motel chains like Holiday Inn, and they stayed sometimes with friends.  They ate out in eating establishments like regular people.  Wherever they stopped, they created attention either in their public showings or by local law enforcement that wanted to protect them.

Truman was also the last President not to make money off of being an ex-President.  He could have sat on boards and make speeches for money but he declined to do so.  Nowadays every President makes big money from being an ex-President.  Truman had to worry about money the rest of his life.  Ex-Presidents had no pensions when he left the office in 1953.  He had to pay all of his own living expenses, and it was a struggle for Mr. Truman.

HST was our last President without a college degree, but by his extensive reading in history and biography it was no matter.

Truman despised Richard Nixon but was forced to stand for a picture with him when he visited Capitol Hill.  On the other hand, Democrats welcomed him back with open arms, and he got to visit his old Senate desk.  It was heart-warming for me to read about the affection that was still in the country for Truman, who left office with a low approval rating due to Korea and 20 years of Democratic control of the office.

Truman set an example in continuing to speak out on politics after her left office.  The author says he was the first former President to do so.

Though President Truman integrated the armed forces (over the objections of Eisenhower) he was insensitive to the civil rights movement and to objectors to the Viet Nam War.  These are perhaps the only objections I have to the man.

One quote from Truman that I have always loved: "I do not understand how anyone can be a Republican."  I agree wholeheartedly.

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Our Poisoned Political Discourse

This observation by author Marilynne Robinson is truer than ever in the wake of "The Donald"
Robinson says: “[W]e’ve gotten into the habit of condescending to one another so that we’re trying to get little cheers from the audience rather than actually dealing with people in good faith, telling them what they need to know, acknowledging the complexity of incredibly complex problems that we have… I think that a lot of people use this tribal language and so on to enflame other people and get little groups to give donations, whatever. But basically, it is beneath their dignity.”
And the media’s appetite for sensationalism, Robinson says, “reinforces the tendency toward meanness and public discourse.”

By the Time Football Season Starts

I hope Donald Trump will disappear, but I am not counting on it.  Among other things this will be remembered as the summer of Trump.  He is so disgusting!

Sunday, July 26, 2015

Harry Truman's Excellent Adventure

This weekend I've been reading a book about an amazing trip Harry and Bess Truman took by automobile from Missouri to DC and New York in 1953 after he had left the Presidency.  It is such a fun book!

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Go Set a Watchman

I like it and I don't care what anybody else thinks.  The book works for me as a window into the thinking of Southerners in the 50's as it became clear that racial integration was on the way.  The histronic fear that this caused is laughable now.  I can see where Lee's editor suggested another book based on her childhood experiences when I read her flashback account of her and her friends playing "Revival."  It's very funny.  The book tails off at the end.  Lastly, I am not concerned that Atticus is a racist.  This is more realistic than Mockingbird.  Comparing the two Atticuses is a waste of time.

Friday, July 24, 2015

Another Bushism

It appears that Jeb is as dumb as his brother.  He says that Medicare needs to be phased out.  How dumb can you get?

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Trump

The media attention to this clown is amazing.  It just shows far politics has dropped in this country.

Monday, July 20, 2015

What is Being Said About Watchman


Set Weather
Subscribe
comments

Harper Lee, Atticus Finch and Go Set a Watchman: What the world is saying

Atticus Finch in court.jpg
In the 1962 movie version of "To Kill a Mockingbird," Gregory Peck played Atticus Finch, a heroic lawyer who takes a stand for justice. In "Go Set a Watchman," Atticus Finch has taken a turn toward segregationist sympathies. (File)
John Hammontree | jhammontree@al.comBy John Hammontree | jhammontree@al.com 
Email the author | Follow on Twitter
on July 20, 2015 at 1:45 PM, updated July 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM
0
Reddit
It's a testament to the power of Harper Lee's words and the South's place in the American imagination that a novel written 60 years ago has suddenly become the book of the moment. The evolution of Scout, Atticus and Harper Lee, herself, has sparked a furious discussion about race relations in the Deep South and throughout the world.
Initial reactions to Go Set a Watchman noted with some horror that Atticus Finch was revealed to be a segregationist. In the week since its publication, several thought pieces have emerged about the danger of building idols, the difference between truly seeking equality and the desire to prove your own moral superiority and the South's role as a mirror for race relations throughout the country.
For many writers, the crux of the book was using Atticus and Scout to explore our own prejudices.
Below are excerpts from much of the thoughtful content produced about the book. What revelations did the book hold for you?
In some ways, Watchman is structured like a mystery novel, with the decanonization and subsequent autopsy of Atticus Finch as the central conundrum around which the story unfolds—a story that turns out to be about Jean Louise's struggle to fathom her own racial (and other) views, not just her father's.
-          The Atlantic: Go Set a Watchman: What About Scout?
But a fictional character can remain unchanged, so why not leave Atticus be? With so many real-life characters tumbling off their pedestals (Bill Cosby comes to mind), why knock such a noble literary hero off his?
-          Chicago Tribune: Why not leave Atticus be?
And Jack makes a forceful argument that running away to the North and thinking you're better for it is a kind of naivete. "It takes a certain kind of maturity to live in the South these days," Jack suggests to Scout.
Lee's father Amasa Coleman Lee, who some call an inspiration for Atticus, first supported segregation and then reportedly had a change of heart while Lee was writing "Mockingbird," becoming a supporter of integration. Lee was said to be very proud of her father for changing his mind.
Atticus Finch is a fictional embodiment of the notion that humans are flawed and embrace contradictory thoughts or engage in actions at odds with former behaviour, the very essence of what makes humans human.
What we have had before us in Atticus Finch is the character middle school English class has taught us to love as our only hope if we are not ourselves politically powerful, a powerful ally who believes in the letter of the law.
-          Huffington Post: Atticus Finch Meets Black Lives Matter
For some audiences, however, Atticus has always been a fantasy, among the first of a durable cinematic character we've come to know well: the white savior. It's a hero type that shows up in far more recent movies as popular and critically praised as "The Blind Side," "The Help" and "Dances With Wolves," in which a white character rescues people of color from their plight.
In fact, there is a well-established body of scholarship on To Kill A Mockingbird that draws attention to flaws in Atticus's character. Pryal's 2010 paper on a "failure of empathy" in the novel argues that Atticus never lives up to his own advice that to understand somebody, you have to "climb into his skin and walk around in it." She points out that Atticus's defense of Tom Robinson, a black character accused of rape, is not about understanding Tom Robinson.
In nineteen-sixties Birmingham, as in Scout's Maycomb, the two Atticuses could coexist, and did. History delivered Southerners of that era into an immoral world where segregation shaped everything.
-          New Yorker: The Atticus we always knew
The importance of this new Atticus is that he is layered and complex in his prejudices; he might even be described as a gentleman bigot, well meaning in his supremacy. In other words, he is human, and in line with emerging research into how racial bias has evolved in our society. He is a character study in the seeming contradiction that compassion and bigotry can not only reside in the same person but often do, which is what makes racial bias, as it has mutated through the generations, so hard to address.
-          New York Times: Our Racial Moment of Truth
As a guide to the complexities of Southern politics, and to the political transition of white Southerners from the Democratic to the Republican Party — a shift that has remade American political life over the last half-century — "Watchman" is actually a more revealing source than Ms. Lee's celebrated novel.
-          New York Times: Atticus Finch Offers a Lesson in Southern Politics
The depiction of Atticus in "Watchman" makes for disturbing reading, and for "Mockingbird" fans, it's especially disorienting. Scout is shocked to find, during her trip home, that her beloved father, who taught her everything she knows about fairness and compassion, has been affiliating with raving anti-integration, anti-black crazies, and the reader shares her horror and confusion.
For many teachers, this presents a conundrum in how the fictional character is taught in classrooms. How will the new book affect or change the way "To Kill a Mockingbird" is taught in middle and high school English classes?
-          New York Times: How Should Schools Deal With the New 'Atticus Finch'?
By the end of the novel, Atticus, again in his wise, paternal, benevolent way, is saying to Scout, here called Jean Louise, you know, you kind of had to kill me. And what he means by that - it's a very Freudian kind of reference - you've got to slay the father in order to develop your own conscience.
-          NPR: Atticus' Halo Comes Apart In 'Watchman'
Truths can be hard, and truths about race in this country are often the hardest — especially when the revelations are about those we love. If racism is helped along not only by cross-burners in sheets, but those whom you have loved and emulated, it feels like too much to bear. The urge to look away is powerful.
Scout and Atticus both believe in a kind of limitation of African-Americans, that they are and were at that time a people in their infancy, the idea that we had to go slow because these people weren't really ready for it. They weren't really ready to vote. They weren't really ready to go to school with white children.
In 1992, the legal scholar Monroe Freedman published a controversial essay in which he recast Atticus Finch as less than a hero. Through a close analysis of the text, Freedman deemed Atticus a "passive participant" in "pervasive injustice." Malcolm Gladwell arrived at a similar conclusion in 2009, comparing Atticus to "Big Jim" Folsom, a two-time governor of Alabama who in the 1950s earned a reputation for race liberalism that was only partly justified. Both Freedman and Gladwell deserve plaudits for arriving at their analyses before the world even knew of Go Set a Watchman.
Race is the true protagonist of the American novel. Our most popular classic fictions have known this, from Moby Dick to Beloved; all these books take on race or talk it out, often in other forms; they are less "horror stories for boys" than ghost stories from a haunted conscience. The South's heroes are all either saints or martyrs. Suffering is part of the landscape, as seen in Mockingbird through mean old Mrs. Dubose who hurls abuses and insults at the children from her porch but decides to kick morphine at the last and finds dignity in a natural, if painful, death.
-          Slate: Ghost Story from a Haunted Conscience
Needless to say, when a major book is released, the pressure to produce immediate analysis is intense—whether these judgments are based on actual scrutiny of the text or on early reviews written by critics.
Yet, for me, making Atticus a brightly principled character in To Kill a Mockingbird did a better job of emphasizing racism's horror. Watchman's focus on universal human frailty seemed jaded and stale—less compelling, at least, than the first book's image of virtue flashing forth, then extinguished, again and again and again.
Atticus Finch — and Gregory Peck's Oscar-winning portrayal of him — is the quintessential white savior. But the trouble with white saviors is that the story is not about those whom they're saving. It's about themselves.
The reason the Atticus of Mockingbird is iconic and the one in Watchman feels alien is because as Lee reworked Watchman into Mockingbird, she tapped into a key component of Southern culture: the need for folk heroes and mythic figures. It is through the folklore of the South that the region places a mirror up to its virtues and failures.
As a novel, Watchman lacks Mockingbird's riveting courtroom drama, its page-turning pacing, its genius structure. Still, there are pleasures to be had, as we live through Scout's humorous adolescent misadventures (one involves falsies) in flashbacks.
-          USA Today: 'Watchman': Is Atticus Finch a racist?
Still, I knew by then that my parents weren't perfect; I had realized as I grew older and came to know them as an adult, and even more so after they were gone and I could ruminate freely on who they were, that they were people with faults and insecurities and infuriating blind spots. I learned to love them for the imperfect people they, like the rest of us, are and were. People, apparently, don't want to hear the same about the fictitious Atticus – which, of course, forms the central pathos of "Mockingbird" to begin with.
-          US News & World Report: Et Tu, Atticus?
Ms. Lee's father was indeed a segregationist, according to people who knew him and according to Charles J. Shields, author of the biography "Mockingbird: A Portrait of Harper Lee." But while his daughter was at work on "Mockingbird," Mr. Lee had a change of heart that moved him to advocate for integration. Mr. Shields said Mr. Lee's late-in-life shift could explain the transformation of Atticus through the author's drafts from a bigot in "Watchman" to a civil-rights hero in "Mockingbird," and why in interviews after "Mockingbird" she spoke glowingly of her father. "She may have been very proud of him," Mr. Shields said.
Stephen Peck says his father would have appreciated the discussion the book has prompted, but would have been troubled by the decision to publish it. Gregory Peck considered Lee a dear friend. She gave him the pocket watch that had belonged to her father, on whom she modeled Atticus. Gregory Peck wore it the night he won an Oscar for the role.
"Go Set a Watchman" is a distressing book, one that delivers a startling rebuttal to the shining idealism of "To Kill a Mockingbird." This story is of the toppling of idols; its major theme is disillusion.
Instead, "Go Set a Watchman" is part of the process of divesting ourselves of the idea that, as Ta-Nehisi Coates put it, "we believe racism to be the property of the uniquely villainous and morally deformed, the ideology of trolls, gorgons and orcs." If racism can belong to Atticus Finch — and if it became his property through the same processes that made him a hero — it can belong to anyone.
Most of us view ourselves like Atticus — noble, brave, right most of the time. But like it or not, we all have latent prejudices grounded in religion, gender, race, or class. This was a challenge in 1954. It is still a challenge today. For years, readers have held up Atticus Finch as the image of perfection.  When I started the book, I didn't want that image to be challenged, but as I finished it, I realized that we can learn just as much from a character's flaws as his attributes. Even our heroes have blind spots, flaws and reprehensible positions.
-          Washington Post: I named my son Atticus, and I'm happier than ever about it
In "Watchman," the cardboard hero becomes a real person, failing as a legion of otherwise sensible Southern politicians and preachers failed in the twin realms of law and religion as the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and his movement exposed Southern racist violence to a watching world.
-          Washington Post: Stripping Atticus Finch of his aura of perfection
Are we worried about Atticus's reputation because we think Lee has slandered her own creation, or because we want badly to believe in an exemplary white Southerner standing up to his neighbors, even if that means making Atticus more exemplary in our memories than Lee did in "To Kill a Mockingbird"? Do we think the internal logic of "Game of Thrones" suggests that it was likely that Sansa Stark would escape sexual violence, or do we badly want her to be an exception to the show's brutal rule because Turner's performance has made her so compellingly real to us?

The Cuckoo's Calling by Robert Galbraith

Robert Galbraith is the pseudonym for J. K. Rowling, author of the Harry Potter series.  This is a mystery, centering around detective Cormoran Strike.  Rowling has since written a second Strike mystery, The Silkworm.

In this book, a famous model dies by plunging from her apartment balcony.  Police call it a suicide.  However, her brother John Bristow thinks otherwise.  He hires Strike to investigate.  This takes Strike into the world of models and celebrity to find the truth behind the death of Lula Landry.

This is a breezy summer read.  At least now I can say I have read a book by J. K. Rowling.

Sunday, July 19, 2015

Atticus and the Flag


Photo
CreditEiko Ojala
FOR as long as many Americans have been alive, the Confederate flag stood watch at the South Carolina capitol, and Atticus Finch, moral guardian-father-redeemer, was arguably the most beloved hero in American literature.
The two symbols took their places in our culture within months of each other. The flag was hoisted above the capitol dome in April 1961, on the centennial of the Civil War during upheavals over civil rights. Atticus Finch debuted in July 1960 in Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird,” a novel that British librarians would later declare the one book, even before the Bible, that everyone should read. Given life by Gregory Peck in the 1962 Oscar-winning film, Atticus Finch would go on to be named the top movie hero of the 20th century.
Nearly at once, both icons have fallen from grace in ways that were unimaginable just months ago. They are forcing a reckoning with ourselves and our history, a reassessment of who we were and of what we might become.
The flag was lowered and placed in storage on July 10 after the South Carolina Legislature voted to take it down in response to the massacre of nine black parishioners at Emanuel A.M.E. Church in Charleston. The following Tuesday, as if receiving a message from the gods of history, the world was introduced to a new Atticus Finch with the publication of “Go Set a Watchman,” a young Harper Lee’s earlier manuscript, set 20 years after the fictional events in “To Kill a Mockingbird,” making it as much artifact as literature. Rather than the Atticus who urges his daughter, Scout, to climb into someone’s skin to understand him, this Atticus is now an old-line segregationist, a principled bigot who has been to a Klan meeting and asks his now-grown daughter visiting from New York City: “Do you want Negroes by the carload in our schools and churches and theaters? Do you want them in our world?”
It has seemed as if the force of history has led us to this moment, stirred as we have been by the recorded killings of unarmed black people at the hands of the police, the uprisings and hashtags, a diatribe of white supremacy from the young man accused in the Charleston rampage, a former slave ship captain’s “Amazing Grace” sung by a sitting president. History is asking us to confront the wistfulness that we had ever escaped racism’s deep roots.
“It is building up to a crisis for those who want to will this away,” the historian Taylor Branch told me. “Things are starting to shake loose, and I keep thinking that things are rumbling to the surface,” he said.
Coming to terms with Atticus Finch as Harper Lee originally imagined him to be means confronting what the country wishes to believe it stands for. “It’s being sent to us as a gift,” the South Carolina poet Nikky Finney said. “It’s a blueprint to decode, something that we need to be better than we are.”
The importance of this new Atticus is that he is layered and complex in his prejudices; he might even be described as a gentleman bigot, well meaning in his supremacy. In other words, he is human, and in line with emerging research into how racial bias has evolved in our society. He is a character study in the seeming contradiction that compassion and bigotry can not only reside in the same person but often do, which is what makes racial bias, as it has mutated through the generations, so hard to address.
“This complex pattern of behavior is not unlike the actual racism that resides in many Americans today,” David R. Williams, a Harvard sociologist who studies the effects of implicit bias on health, said of the new characterization of Atticus Finch. “As an American raised in this society with negative implicit biases against black people, you are not a bad person. You are simply a normal American. We have to come to grips with the reality that this racism is so deeply embedded in our culture that it shapes how we see the world, it shapes our beliefs, our behavior, our actions toward members of other groups. We have to examine ourselves in a profound way.”
Exactly 150 years ago, the country was at the start of a post-Civil War Reconstruction, a time of reassessment with hopes that those who had been enslaved would have a chance at equality in the country they had helped build for free. Reconstruction lasted little more than a decade, and a more insidious form of subjugation, the Jim Crow caste system, set in motion a century of hardship and divisions from which we have yet to recover.
With the lowering of the Confederate flag in the state that was the first to secede and where the first shots were fired, could we now be at the start of a true and more meaningful reconstruction? It would require courage to relinquish the false comfort of embedded racial mythologies and to open our minds to a more complete history of how we got here. It would require a generosity of spirit to see ourselves in the continued suffering of a people stigmatized since their arrival on these shores and to recognize how the unspoken hierarchies we have inherited play out in the current day and hold us back as a country.
The day after the flag went down in South Carolina, an editorial in The Richmond Times-Dispatch made the stunning declaration that it was finally time for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission and that Virginia should take the lead. “Accounting has not occurred,” the paper wrote, “the half remains untold.” This is precisely what history demands and what this moment requires. Perhaps a new reconstruction could truly take hold and inspire the rest of the country if it sprang from the region that resisted it in the first place.
Beyond the South, could the unmasking of the nation’s mythical conscience, Atticus Finch, wake us up to the truth of who we have been all along, help us come to grips with an America that never was? We have needed so badly to get past the guilt and embrace what is true — and to find strength in that discovery.