Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Jeffrey Toobin on Chief Justice Roberts

Jeffrey Toobin offers a chilling summary of the actions of Chief Justice Roberts and summarizes as follows. Roberts is the most dangerous man in this country as tries to move the country to the hard right. This is what Republicanism leads to: favoring the state over the individual, favoring the powerful over the less powerful, speeding up executions, always favoring the advantaged over the disadvantaged. This is the Republican Party in judicial action.


Roberts’s hard-edged performance at oral argument offers more than just a rhetorical contrast to the rendering of himself that he presented at his confirmation hearing. “Judges are like umpires,” Roberts said at the time. “Umpires don’t make the rules. They apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules. But it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ballgame to see the umpire.” His jurisprudence as Chief Justice, Roberts said, would be characterized by “modesty and humility.” After four years on the Court, however, Roberts’s record is not that of a humble moderate but, rather, that of a doctrinaire conservative. The kind of humility that Roberts favors reflects a view that the Court should almost always defer to the existing power relationships in society. In every major case since he became the nation’s seventeenth Chief Justice, Roberts has sided with the prosecution over the defendant, the state over the condemned, the executive branch over the legislative, and the corporate defendant over the individual plaintiff. Even more than Scalia, who has embodied judicial conservatism during a generation of service on the Supreme Court, Roberts has served the interests, and reflected the values, of the contemporary Republican Party.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think it is impossible to serve on the Supreme Court and not be swayed by your personal feelings and biases. I think we need realize this and accept it. It seems most people want justices to apply the law impartially, but that is only an unreachable ideal. You are who you are, in part because of your experiences, and that colors your interpretation of law and the cases before you.

Fred Hudson said...

Amen!