Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Building Castles on Wet Sand, Redux

Today Barack Obama's victory has had some time to begin sinking in, and it is quite clear that his supporters and the media are determined to put a thick coat of shiny varnish over the reality of the "why" of his election. Obama's acceptance speech was, of course, filled with the sweeping generalities and grandiose phrases that he has become known for and that his supporters swoon over. It was interesting to notice that he began his 2012 campaign two months before he even begins serving his first term. He used the language typical of politicians, saying that, "It may take more than a year. It may take more than one term." I never suspected otherwise.

The crowd in Chicago was mostly filled with the demographic that voted him into office--the young, the black, and the Latino. Pardon my redundancy, as I spent some time on these three groups in my previous post, but I feel a need to spend a moment on them again.

The young: It is often said that our future hopes lie in America's youth, and I cannot disagree with that, since there is no alternate group in which hope could stand much of a chance of carrying on in. Certainly one would be foolish to lie their future hopes in the very old or the dead. In other words, the statement is a common sense phrase which people put significance into, one of the slogans of humanity that has been repeated so often that it has become a cliche, devoid of any real meaning. The proof of that is in the fact that, in this election, Obama's supporters have glossed over the axiom, and in doing so have overlooked both the meaning of the phrase as well as some key words within it.

What the phrase means is that we, as adults, are obligated to teach our children the truth, regardless of who we think should be the victor of history or who appears to be the enemy within it; that in our childrens' upbringing we should hold the apparent victor to task just as diligently as we once did the enemy; and that it goes assumed that the torch of this knowledge, experience, and tremendous obligation is something to be passed to them only after they have learned the lessons that only experience and truth can supply.

But, in electing Obama, the Left has not put their future in youth, but handed them the keys to the family car without so much as one single driving lesson. They have, along with so much else, closed their eyes to the key word "future" in the statement. Instead they have, in their desperation to envoke that still undefined mantra "change," tried to smuggle the future into the present. They have cashed in all of their chips on not an improbable but an impossible long shot. If any of these people had spent fifteen minutes alone with a typical young person aged 18-25, perhaps even 30, they would have quickly seen that they were on the verge of handing the largest responsibility of American's collective to a bunch of people who are utterly uninterested in such matters as government, history, and politics; who have spent a woefully inadequate amount of time pursuing real facts and boring, historical truths; a group whose decisons are largely based on hormones, alcohol, and a leftover '60's and American Idol mindset that is one part logic and nine parts ignorant, excitable, herd-mentality irresponsibility. (If nothing else, my own reading of Neitzsche's works forever scorched in my mind the destructive power of herd mentalities.) The Left complains about the sub-par public education system--and, on this, I fully agree with them; the education cirriculum in the US is terribly below average, and the schools seem to focus on pointless activities which condone totally barbaric and asinine social hierarchies which should make Lord of the Flies not only required reading but required understanding--yet entrusts the future of this country to young people whose summation of knowledge was chiseled out by that same system.

But the verge has been literally jumped over and it is too late. Unfortunately, these inexcusable naive Leftists have taken the rest of us over the cliff with them. How foolish is the man who cannot check his intellectual knowledge with both experience and common sense; yet how much more foolish is he who entrusts to babes the summation of all of these. The person who has read a thousand books and lives by them alone is ten times more ignorant than the one who has never read one and follows him. The youth in the US is not progressing, it is regressing towards absolute ignorance; and it is the chronically foolish Left and its propogandist professors who are partly to blame. They equate their petty intellectualism with real knowledge, which is further proof that some people should not pick up and try to read deep books. Because when they do they never get more than a few pages in, yet they go ahead and figure it is enough to begin to believe in the myths propogated by themselves. Their own yellow highlighted, eager false starts in abandoned thrift store novels which fall silent after a few pages is a direct mirror image of and a condemnation against their youth's closeted, short-term worldview. Soon the youth's attention will be drawn elsewhere, and we will--again--be stuck with the liberal's decision made for all of us. Terrible tyrranies have been borne and prospered on such scenarios as these.

The Black: I will not spend much time on this topic, since there will be those who know the reality of the state of blacks today and those who will refuse to see it. With that said, this election has been the most racist in recent American history. The 96-98% turnout of blacks to vote in this election cycle for Barack Obama was the first indicator that race was indeed going to play a pivitol role in the election--but for the oppostie reasons the Left has for years assumed. I will go no further into already unchallenged ground on this point except to say that if it were not for typical black people and their ignorant, white, self-hating supporters this election would have been overwhelmingly red. Blacks have been programmed into believing that white people are living the easy life while they still constantly struggle against white oppression--nevermind the real history of English blacks who in the nineteenth century owned black slaves, or the large number of blacks who sold their own relatives into slavery off Africa's ivory coast way back when--and now they somehow think Barack Obama is going to pay their bills for them. Christ. I hate Bill Clinton. He was the "brilliant" man who shucked and jived under-achievers into biting off more than they could chew and told them they deserved it, for, apparently, no other reasons than simply existing. If you are working at Burger King and want a $200,000 house, you need to work a better job, not wait for the gubberment to send you some free money.

I will not debate liberals because I already know they have no grasp on reality, but I will say that, in the last several days, the overwhelming number of blacks I have heard speak say things like, "Obama will give us our money back,"--but never venture to explain who has stolen their money, why, or who it is exactly should be giving it back to them--"Obama will pay our bills and mortgage," and, "We have won." (What, exactly, they have won, again, remains vague.) What I do know is that these folks have won a train ticket to reality, and the trip begins in January 2009. Liberal Leftisits are going to be aboard as well, whether they like it or not--but, considering they are so eager to embrace Socialism, it would be illogical to assume they desire a choice, right?

Fact: there are many, many more racist blacks today than there are whites. Anyone care to challenge me? Bring it on. White liberals have, stupidly, helped propagate a myth that needs to die. The only set more detestible than welfare scum hiding behind a thin vaneer of pride--ie, racism--is the absolutely ignorant, clueless liberals who champion their rape of responsibility. Democrats, I tell you what the esteeemed Obama's preacher once told his flock: the chickens have come home to roost. And it will be up to you to feed them, give them money, and wipe up their shit. Maybe you and Brad Pitt can sink every dime you have into giving people who are too lazy to work a brand-new house to let go to waste. I will not.

I have challenged numerous liberals to come witness the ignorant, "gimme" mindset of the majority of blacks in my workplace and my wife's, and my challenge has gone unanswered. Liberals--today's liberals--would much rather pretend they have helped right a wrong as opposed to the reality of their actions, which has utterly given fuel and false testimony to a wrong. The truth is that the black community is going extinct at its own hand. Liberals, in their political correctness and naivity, are pretending otherwise. They like to pretend that it is somehow white people's fault. These people are absolute fools. Period. Even Obama does not subscribe to such idiocy; and he has, to his credit, called out blacks numerous times for their blatant irresponsibility. But, thanks to liberals, they are not listening.

Liberals only think they are smart. They do not even have the basics down, yet they are jumping up into the realm of those who spend all of their free time poring over such polemics as they think to understand; and they really think that the parasitic, ignorant, illiterate Kool-Aid drinkers have any ground to stand upon whatsoever. Really? Well, where are you? I will tell you where--silent, slinking, and falling in line with the mythology of Amerika instead of the reality of America.

These idiots still think it is the 1960's, and they are too blind to realize that that era has reversed itself into an apologetic for black self-destruction. Just yesterday, an anonymous friend said to me, in response to the proposition that blacks were blindly voting black, "I have never thought of that." Wow. Are you serious? How naive are our supposed uber-intelligent? More than I had even feared.

Point in fact is that the myth of white oppression was vanquished last night. As the black comedian Wanda Sykes said, when speculating on the election of a black president, "We'll no longer be able to blame the man when we are the man."

The Latinos: When a majority of a people who are essentially skimming off the prosperity of others without suffering any consequences are considered an important factor in an election, then both the election and the objective of that election should be brought into serious question. But of course it was not. Obama has no intentions to seal the borders against illegal aliens, and that is why the Mexicans turned out for him.

If any supposed historian has ever heard of a little old empire named Rome, raise your hand. Plenty of expostulation has gone into what brought about the collapse of the Roman Empire, but historians and archaeologists are overwhelmingly in agreement that among the contributing factors was that of unopposed invasion. What this means is that people from foreign provinces waltzed their way into Rome to live--much as the Latinos are now invading the US--and they (as we currently are) were totally acquiescent to the invasion. In other words, Rome--the world's greatest empire--fell, and, according to the current mindsets of this Republic, so will we.

In summation, it is ironic that the Leftist liberals have continued to fall for the myth that their own elite have created in modern times. In the meantime, most intelligent people are lamenting the fact that a black man has been elected president on a silent racist platform, empty rhetoric, and the hypocritical self-destruction of his own self-imposed raison de 'tere.

No comments: