There is a big difference between natural speculation and actual evidence, between speculation supported with some evidence and speculation without evidence. Then we could debate the evidence, which is what should be our focus. This thought comes from a just now discussion of the JFK assassination with a friend at Starbucks. My friend said Oswald was quoted as saying he was "just a patsy," which implies he has had accomplice(s). Well, maybe so, you can read this thought into Oswald's comment. But without ironclad evidence, his supposed comment by itself means nothing to me.