Thursday, May 18, 2017

Putin Pays Trump?

Kevin McCarthy made the politically explosive assertion in a private conversation on Capitol Hill in June 2016 with his fellow GOP leaders. House Speaker Paul D. Ryan interjected and stopped the conversation from exploring McCarthy’s assertion, saying: “No leaks. ... This is how we know we’re a real family here.”

Let's End if Quickly

Trump has caused a catastrophe. Let’s end it quickly.

 Opinion writer  
There is really only one issue in American politics at this moment: Will we accelerate our way to the end of the Trump story, or will our government remain mired in scandal, misdirection and paralysis for many more months — or even years?
There is a large irony in the politics behind this question. The Democrats’ narrow interest lies in having President Trump hang around as close to the 2018 midterm elections as possible. Yet they are urging steps that could get this resolved sooner rather than later. Republicans would likely be better off if Trump were pushed off the stage. Yet up to now, they have been dragging their feet.
The reports that Trump asked then-FBI Director James B. Comey to drop his investigation of former national security adviser Michael Flynn may finally be concentrating Republican minds.
They certainly focused the decision-making of Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, who announced Wednesday afternoon that he was naming former FBI director Robert S. Mueller as a special counsel to investigate possible coordination between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russian interference in the election.
House Speaker Paul D. Ryan signaled the changed mood earlier in the day not by what he said but by what he didn’t.
 Play Video 3:16
Justice Department appoints special counsel to investigate Trump and Russia
The Justice Department appointed special counsel to investigate Trump and Russia on May 17. (Peter Stevenson,Jason Aldag,Whitney Leaming/The Washington Post)
Ryan has been embarrassingly eager to defend Trump, but he did not rush to his support this time. Instead, the Wisconsin Republican called for a “sober” and “dispassionate” response, warned against “rushing to judgment” and insisted that “our job is to get the facts.” When word got out (probably from Comey or his sympathizers) of what Trump had said to the FBI director about Flynn, Republicans (such as Rosenstein) were left with no choice but to pursue the matter further.
The speaker expressed faith in Trump only when prompted by a shouted question at the end of his news conference. After some thought, he replied with a soft “I do” when asked if he had “full confidence” in the president.
Nothing could be worse than slow-walking the Trump inquiries. The evidence is already overwhelming that he is temperamentally and intellectually incapable of doing the job he holds. He is indifferent to acquiring the knowledge the presidency demands and apparently of the belief that he can improvise hour to hour. He will violate norms whenever it suits him and cross ethical lines whenever he feels like it.
He also lies a lot, and has been perfectly happy to burn the credibility of anyone who works for him. White House statements are about as believable as those issued regularly by the Kremlin.
And Trump’s friend Vladimir Putin could not resist interfering yet again in our politics. Putin offered to provide Congress with a record of our president’s meeting with top Russian diplomats to shed light on exactly what highly classified intelligence information Trump shared with them. Adding to the insult, the Russian leader spoke of a “political schizophrenia” taking hold in the United States that was “eliciting concern” in his country. 
Perhaps Putin’s taunt will elicit increasing concern among Republicans that our nation cannot endure much more of this. 
The surest sign that the bottom is falling out from under Trump was a Wall Street Journal editorial that declared flatly: “Presidencies can withstand only so much turbulence before they come apart.” The Journal warned that Trump was on the verge of betraying his supporters, “as his Presidency sinks before his eyes.” 
Any GOP leader losing the support of the semi-official organ of Republican conservatism should know that his partisans are headed to the exits. 
But how can we speed our nation’s escape from the catastrophe Trump has created? The Senate Intelligence Committee took an important step by announcing a bipartisan invitation to Comey to testify. The sooner he tells his story, the better.
Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer of New York proposedthat both parties demand that Congress get any memos, tapes and transcripts shedding light on Trump’s meetings with the Russian diplomats and with Comey. 
The naming of an independent counsel cannot become an excuse to pull back on congressional fact-finding. The country needs to know if there was collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia whether or not a crime was committed. And Democrats should ask Republicans to join them in pledging opposition to any appointee to head the FBI who is not universally seen as immune to Trump’s influence. 
It shows how far along we are that fears are already being voiced of a political backlash from his supporters if Trump is railroaded out of office. But delaying the process of getting to the truth will harm our country far more. And Republicans who throw up roadblocks will be hurt most of all.

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Who's Worried?

The stock market took its biggest dive since before President Trump’s election, as investors began to grapple with the increasing possibility that Washington would be consumed with chaos and fail to enact policies to boost the economy.

Finally the Beginning of the End?


Ad will collapse in seconds…

Trump’s Protective Republican Wall in Congress Cracks

By 
Image
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz. Photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
The Republican Congress has surrounded the Trump administration with a protective wall. The majority party has denied Democratic demands for independent investigations, quashed bills to force President Trump to release his tax returns, and avoided any serious effort at oversight. Hours after the New York Times reported that James Comey has memosdescribing Donald Trump attempting to steer him away from the Russia investigation, that wall began to crack.
Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, and heretofore a staunch Trump defender, has subpoenaed all records of Comey’s meetings with the president. Cathy McMorris-Rodgers, the fourth-ranking House Republican, endorsed the request, followed within hours by House Speaker Paul Ryan.
Opening up Comey’s trove of evidence is hardly a radical step. But it paves the way for a series of revelations that are extremely likely to depict the president as having committed an impeachable offense. The implication of the next step is apparent to many Republicans. Senator John McCain says the charges have “reached Watergate size and scale.” Dana Bash reportsthat Congressional Republicans are discussing an independent prosecutor or an independent commission — two steps the party has avoided so far.
While Fox News personalities, like ex-journalist Tucker Carlson, filled their time either defending Trump or frantically distracting from the scandal, the network reported it had difficulty rounding up Republican members of Congress to toe the administration line. It is not clear the administration has formulated any line of defense yet. At least some of its staffers, who have created the leakiest administration in history, understand what lies ahead of them. One senior Trump administration official, and campaign veteran, tells the Daily Beast, “I don’t see how Trump isn’t completely fucked.”
Congress is far, far away from the majority of the House, and two-thirds of the Senate, necessary to impeach and remove a president of their own party. But the policy of shutting down all oversight or investigation is no longer tenable. And once the apparatus for producing evidence against Trump begins to churn, there is no telling where it will end. A few days ago, impeachment and removal seemed inconceivable. Suddenly, it isn’t

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Being

PHILOSOPHY

Is 'Being' The Same For Everyone?

French philosopher and mathematician Descartes.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
How do you know you are not now dreaming?
Any test you might perform, you might be merely dreaming that you are performing.
How can you get outside experience to verify that things are, at least once and for all, the way they seem to be?
This is philosophical skepticism in the potent and daring form that comes down to us from René Descartes.
But there are other equally challenging styles of skeptical argument. Take the whole question of other minds. Each of us knows his or her own mind. We experience. We judge. We perceive. We want. But the minds of others? How can we ever know how things are, internally, with another. Her experience? His feelings? His intentions? These are cut off from us, hidden, as they are, behind a veil of mere behavior, or mere words (which is just a fancy variety of behavior).
That skepticism is not alone the concern of academic philosophy is demonstrated by the steady stream of skeptical storylines in our most popular movies. In Blade Runnerfor example, we are asked to take seriously the thought that so-called replicants lack thought and feeling, lack personality and worth, and for the simple reason that they are artificial. But what the movie drives home is the fact that the basis of our belief that replicants think and feel is no better and, crucially, no worse, than our confidence that any of our friends or loved ones really think and feel and experience.
And The Matrix simply plays a variation on one of Descartes' skeptical themes — that we are induced to hallucinate a false reality by an evil manipulator bent on deceiving us.
Skeptical worries are not confined to science fiction. In Angel Heart, we experience the world through the eyes of a fundamentally unreliable first-person guide; and in Gaslight it is the person we think we know and trust the most that, it eventually turns out, is bent on our brutal exploitation and injury.
Despite the vibrancy of skeptical ideas and themes in popular culture, as well as philosophy, it is almost universally acknowledged that the practical implications of skepticism are utterly negligible.
We may not have sufficient reason to believe in the minds of others. But you'd have to be mad to seriously entertain the possibility that your loved ones are not, like you, really conscious beings.
And if you really thought that the existence of a world outside your head, altogether, were, at least for all we know, a mere figment, it is hard to see how you could ever carry on.
And anyway, as Scottish philosopher David Hume said, even the skeptical philosopher leaves his or her skepticism behind when he or she leaves the study. Skepticism is a live rational possibility, but not a real practical one.
I thought of this relation in connection with the predicament facing this country. It's news from nowhere to be reminded that there is a deep political divide in America today. Many people I know are anxious. We watch lips move. We hear the words. But it doesn't add up. It is hard to really even comprehend the thoughts or feelings of people on the other side. It is as if our political culture has gone the way of skepticism.
Our alienation from each other is so great that we stand to each other in something like the ways that skeptical philosophers have always supposed: We are confined to the outward marks, the mere behavior — and that's just not enough to know another, to really understand him or her, or to trust.
Real skepticism is a dangerous proposition. If we lack the common ground even to know each other, then what are the prospects of peaceful resolution of our conflicts?

Alva Noë is a philosopher at the University of California, Berkeley, where he writes and teaches about perception, consciousness and art. He is the author of several books, including his latest, Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015). You can keep up with more of what Alva is thinking on Facebook and on Twitter: @alvanoe